NEWS:
Dalton McGuinty’s proposed SuperCorp scheme is nothing more than a desperate cash grab, to fuel runaway Liberal spending, without providing any increased value to the taxpayer or improvements to customer service. Ontario PC Leader Tim Hudak today called on McGuinty to shelve his plan to merge Ontario Crown corporations into a single bureaucratic and inefficient monster corporation.
Hudak pointed out that the process of lumping completely unrelated businesses such as the Liquor Control Board of Ontario, Ontario Power Generation, Hydro One, and the Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corp into a single corporation actually reduces the value of each asset and represents the kind of idea that the private sector abandoned over twenty years ago. In addition, the new monster corporation will be even less accountable and result in even more red-tape for consumers and families than the businesses that preceded it.
Hudak also highlighted the existing McGuinty Liberal pattern of scandals, entitlement and waste at agencies such as eHealth, OLG and the LHINs. These scandals leave the public with very little confidence that Dalton McGuinty’s SuperCorp will not become yet another billion dollar boondoggle.
QUOTES:
– Ontario PC Leader Tim Hudak
– Ontario PC Leader Tm Hudak
QUICK FACTS:
The questions that the McGuinty Liberals must answer about their proposed SuperCorp scheme:
- How will frontline customer service be improved by lumping together lotto sales, alcohol retailing, nuclear assets and management of Ontario’s electricity grid into one monster corporate entity?
- What guarantees are there that this new SuperCorp will not, in fact, produce even more red-tape and be even less accountable to Ontario families, than its predecessor companies?
- Given the McGuinty Liberals’ role as the architects of the billion dollar eHealth scandal, what safeguards exist to protect the taxpayer interest and prevent a similar scandal from occurring?
- How much revenue is Dalton McGuinty planning to blow out the door in new spending as a result of this scheme?

